Customers work directly with experienced cybersecurity practitioners rather than through multiple consulting layers.
Validation remains separate from the operational activity or remediation being evaluated.
Material conclusions remain connected to authorized evidence, assumptions, limitations, and human review.
Technical evidence is translated into decision priorities, confidence, business impact, and remaining risk.
Each pilot begins with one defined question, approved evidence sources, clear responsibilities, and explicit success criteria.
Qualified customers can access the IV&V Officer Security Validation & Assurance Pilot through an established Marketplace purchasing path.
Independent Verification and Validation asks a fundamental question:
Earlier professional experience involved applying IV&V principles in mission-critical environments associated with NASA programs. The work emphasized independent evaluation, system integration, objective evidence, repeatable analysis, and defensible conclusions.
Those principles now form the methodological foundation of IV&V Officer.
![[interface] image of a computer showcasing educational software (for a edtech)](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6ab1502d61088f8ac7d1737f/6ab55a7cf2fabb141e5976b8_1f176036-2d40-40d2-a2e2-99d2ccb4963a.avif)
Has the vulnerability been effectively addressed?Confirm that corrective actions resolved the issue and strengthened the organization's security posture.
Our mission is to help organizations make better cybersecurity decisions by bringing greater independence, clarity, and accountability to security assurance. Through IV&V Officer, we are advancing an evidence-driven approach that helps organizations better understand their security investments, identify where attention is needed, and establish a stronger basis for decisions that affect risk, resilience, and the business.
Start with one important security question and determine what the available evidence supports, what remains unresolved, and what leadership should consider next.